gh0p.biz - The parents’ basement edition of "Ultimate Security"

Anyway whatever you believe is deleted on your device it is recoverable until it gets overwritten by new data. That’s what secure data erasure does.
I wonder why none of those secure apps, to my knowledge, have this function.
Always there is a kind of limitation.

But I keep saying these kind tools are secure to protect from hackers, some tech companies not from LE.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JohnnyDoe
Good to see @gh0p on the forum to defend himself, tbh I largely agree with him so I wouldnt say his services may be pointless given that many individuals over 40 usually dont even have basic knowledge about these concepts I definitely see a niche for his services.
He likely should watch out he doesnt get banned on OCT for being here
 
Good to see @gh0p on the forum to defend himself,
Nobody accused him of anything. I simply posted a review.
Instead of using the critiques to improve, he chose to attack me and anyone who called out his amateurish approach.
tbh I largely agree with him so I wouldnt say his services may be pointless given that many individuals over 40 usually dont even have basic knowledge about these concepts I definitely see a niche for his services.
There is surely a “niche” made of people over 40 who don’t know better: that’s exactly the kind of crowd OCT preys on. Selling recycled jargon to the uninformed doesn’t make a service useful, it just makes it marketable.
He likely should watch out he doesnt get banned on OCT for being here
He’s safe as long as he keeps glorifying OCT and lending credibility to its parade of fake members. On a scam forum like that, stepping outside the script gets you banned. Here, no one is silenced, and that’s the difference between open discussion and a paid scam funnel.

I'm not backed by anyone,
@JohnLocke: "Over the time @gh0p has been the main sponsor of OCT"

Anyone who receives glowing praise from @JohnLocke instantly smells of scam. Simply because anyone who doesn’t pay his pizzo gets banned or ghosted (see @NewHorizonsParaguay, @Qzejol, @Laid Back Llama, and plenty of others over the years). Positive reviews vanish, while bad ones magically appear under his fake accounts.
I don't like the concept of guilt by association, but sometimes you have to distance yourself from scammers if you want to protect your reputation. Otherwise, you risk sliding straight into what the US would classify under RICO*.

*Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization
 
Share the PGP messages in public, check session ID mentioned before.
Read what I said before. I don't store them but clients do. I didn't make a "review" of JohnnyDoe it is the other way around hence burden of proof is on him not me. If Johnny was a real client he would have them but he doesn't under whatever excuses.

Alternative Contact (PGP recommended):

Private Message on OCT

Email: admin [[ ||| ]] gh0p.biz

Signal: On Request
SimpleX: On Request
Telegram: @gh0pbiz
🤣


Better to specify it’s on his own website.

I can't actually believe I have to explain what it means. Only furthers my point you will find the most ridiculous things to high five each other about and what the entire made up review to which no proof was delivered, is about.

I super clearly said:
FYI I actually have never talked with anyone on email so yet another proof your review is 100% a lie.
Do we entertain the English language? I didn't say I don't have email contacts, I said nobody has contacted me through that medium. I lost enough brain cells explaining it.

I'll leave it at that.
 
  • Clown
Reactions: JohnnyDoe
Read what I said before. I don't store them but clients do. I didn't make a "review" of JohnnyDoe it is the other way around hence burden of proof is on him not me. If Johnny was a real client he would have them but he doesn't under whatever excuses.

Coconut mct oil will help you recover your cells.

I don't have any personal problem with you, I didn't insult you, I tagged you because you claimed you can bypass the LE techniques and I don't understand why do you think it isn't a legit concern.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Justit
It is exactly what my initial thoughts were and @CEO and @JohnnyDoe proved it! PGP was such an obvious excuse that is never used or used occasionally… he obviously uses alternative communication channels… what a joke!
I’m wondering how does a 40+ yo person is taught to use pgp. I highly doubt it.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: CEO and Justit
I’m wondering how does a 40+ yo person is taught to use pgp. I highly doubt it.
It is indeed a bit cumbersome, but there are some outlook (desktop) plugins that make it easier. Emclient has a built in function.
But probably it makes more sense to provide the client with a secure phone (or a bunch of phones to distribute to his contacts) with pre installed tools.
 
Now that we discovered that @EliasIT is just an alias of @JohnLocke, I'm starting to think that @gh0p might be @JohnLocke himself :shifty:
Or, as a minimum, there is a special relationship between the two, as demonstrated by @EliasIT's review proudly displayed on GH0P Security & Business:
ghop offshorecorptalk.jpg

@gh0p, if you are real and so good at what you do, why do you need to use fake members as testimonials?

I also suggest that you offer your services to Israel, as you probably know better. See their top security breached by Iran: Your expertise is wasted on the OffshoreCorpTalk scam forum.
 
Just to recap about @gh0p: 3 of the 6 reviews he publishes are from fake members, all controlled by @JohnLocke
This is the kind of "experts" you find on the OfffshoreCorptalk scam forum :clown:
 
This article is certainly the most incriminating.
gh0p.biz landing page has the word "professional" stated 3 times, linked to what is defined as a framework "refined by experience".

Any "professional" with "experience" would avoid PGP, and tell the elite individuals to use age.
If not age, nobody "professional" enough would use PGP.
They simply would ask their customers to use common E2EE messaging solutions.

That's not because you see PGP used on your favorite darknet markets that it's the best for elite individuals.

This service is a cocktail of marketing bullshit.
And, as @Laid Back Llama said:
Most of the stuff in the privacy world is free and easily findable online. There are hundreds of high quality privacy guides that perfectly do the job for any scenario.
 
Just to recap about @gh0p: 3 of the 6 reviews he publishes are from fake members, all controlled by @JohnLocke
This is the kind of "experts" you find on the OfffshoreCorptalk scam forum :clown:
The recap is you failed to provide proof you "hired @gh0p twice for small, clearly defined tasks under two different identities to test him" and kept redirecting the topic with your alts rambling about stuff you heard somewhere about computers. All of who keep reiterating the same thing, same line of thinking not weird at all. On which topic you keep projecting about fake users and members.

If you say these are controlled by the admin, that isn't of my concern. If each of them contacted me and wanted different set of tasks and setups done, that's again not on me. I don't have issue with putting the reviews because those were legitimate requests.

This article is certainly the most incriminating.
gh0p.biz landing page has the word "professional" stated 3 times, linked to what is defined as a framework "refined by experience".

Any "professional" with "experience" would avoid PGP, and tell the elite individuals to use age.
If not age, nobody "professional" enough would use PGP.
They simply would ask their customers to use common E2EE messaging solutions.

That's not because you see PGP used on your favorite darknet markets that it's the best for elite individuals.

This service is a cocktail of marketing bullshit.
And, as @Laid Back Llama said:
Hold on we have another expert like CEO in the house (or is it just Johnny again). Yeah any professional would avoid PGP because majority of open source software isn't signed with PGP signatures. Hold on I used the word professional again, 4th time. Add it to your poor attempt to add a negative/drawback point because I said it a 4th time. Show yourself out kid.

Nobody said to use PGP for ongoing messaging. It's used to contact me on OCT or email from where we can take it to more secure solutions. Another explanation where I lost brain cells, good work.

If I offered what's purely available out there, I'd mention it on the website or sales topic. What I do and offer goes beyond that. Kind of how @JohnnyDoe went "beyond" on OCT. He connected people to a invoicing money laundering network that got people in trouble down the line (after all he got raided 3 times per his words), but he kept looking in private for accounts to funnel stolen money from German bank accounts. Extra service and value is my point.

All with that I'm closing the so called "recap". Feel free to attempt to try and throw more kindergarten level attempts at me. But seeing your mentally handicapped "PGP is not for professionals" narrative and other equally challenged posts, I can see the only thing you have up your sleeve is blinding me with your passport photo. Try harder Jumbo.
 
Kind of how @JohnnyDoe went "beyond" on OCT. He connected people to a invoicing money laundering network that got people in trouble down the line (after all he got raided 3 times per his words), but he kept looking in private for accounts to funnel stolen money from German bank accounts. Extra service and value is my point.
You forgot that I kidnap people. That’s what IRS agents do.
What you write qualifies you. Keep scamming poor OCT members with your “elite services”, that’s where you belong.
 
On which topic you keep projecting about fake users and members.

If you say these are controlled by the admin, that isn't of my concern. If each of them contacted me and wanted different set of tasks and setups done, that's again not on me. I don't have issue with putting the reviews because those were legitimate requests.
Amazing how the “top security expert” hasn’t noticed he’s been talking to the same person under different names the entire time 😅 Truly, a masterclass in elite security awareness!
 
those were legitimate requests.
As legitimate as yourself and Offshorecorptalk 🤣
That’s the only place where you have some chances of fooling people. “Highly Rated & Trusted Security Provider on Offshorecorptalk”, as you write on your pathetic website, tells all about you and your services. :clown:
 
Good to see our friend 'Nick' is a corporate services professional, UHNWI (which apparently could not be confirmed by our OpSec expert) and HNWI at the same time.
I do agree that PGP is fine to sign messages. But I generally do not believe in any form of email encryption as it is an inherently insecure method of communication. And it needs two parties to follow good OpSec practices, imo better to use a method of communication that is secure by default (and therefore definitely not the PM system on OCT apparently, continuing to use this whilst knowing the admin actively reads messages here is insane and goes to show you don't give a fck about your clients and only want $$$$)
 

JohnnyDoe.is is an uncensored discussion forum
focused on free speech,
independent thinking, and controversial ideas.
Everyone is responsible for their own words.

Quick Navigation

User Menu